Heading 4003
1 subheadings
GCP ELASTOMERIC INC.v.PRESIDENT OF THE CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCYAppeal No. AP-2010-011Decision and reasons issuedMonday, April 4, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS DECISIONSTATEMENT OF REASONSBACKGROUNDPROCEDURAL HISTORYGOODS IN ISSUEANALYSISStatutory FrameworkRelevant Provisions of the Customs Tariff, General Rules and Explanatory NotesTariff Classification of the Goods in...
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
[11]and the Explanatory Notes to the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System,
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
[12]published by the Customs Co-operation Council (also known as the World Customs Organization), as amended from time to time.” Accordingly, unlike chapter and section notes, theExplanatory Notesare not binding on the Tribunal in its classification of imported goods. However, the Federal Court of Appeal has stated that these notes should be applied, unless there is a sound reason to do...
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
9. In headings 40.01, 40.02, 40.03, 40.05 and 40.08, the expressions “plates”, “sheets” and “strip” apply only to plates, sheets and strip and to blocks of regular geometric shape, uncut or simply cut to rectangular (including square) shape, whether or not having the character of articles and whether or not printed or otherwise surface-worked, but not otherwise cut to shape or further...
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
23. The dispute in this matter concerns the heading in which the goods in issue should be classified. GCP is of the view that the goods in issue should be classified in heading No. 40.03. The CBSA argues for classification in heading No. 40.08. The parties, therefore, both agree that the goods in issue areprima facieclassifiable in only one heading of theCustoms Tariffin accordance with Rule 1...
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
30. The record shows that, at one stage of their manufacturing process, the goods in issue would have gone through a devulcanization process that purportedly would have qualified them as being made of “reclaimed rubber”, as described in theExplanatory Notesto heading No. 40.03. That point was not contested by the CBSA. However, GCP did not contest the CBSA’s assertion that there is no...
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
38. The appeal is dismissed. 1. R.S.C. 1985 (2d Supp.), c. 1 [Act]. 2. Tribunal Exhibits AP-2010-011-19, AP-2010-011-20. 3. S.C. 1997, c. 36. 4. Tribunal Exhibit AP-2010-011-05A, tab 2. 5. Exhibits B-01, B-02, B-03. 6. Exhibit B-04. 7. Canada is a signatory to theInternational Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, which governs the Harmonized System. 8....
Source: citt_decision (AP-2010-011)
CustomsLogIQ ఈ సుంకం డేటాను AI వర్గీకరణకు ఉపయోగిస్తుంది. ఉచితంగా ప్రయత్నించండి.
CustomsLogIQ ఉచితంగా ప్రయత్నించండి